List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Confirm organisation competitive systems and practices status | 1.1 | Establish number and status of competitive systems and practices techniques being used within the organisation. |
| 1.2 | Identify key performance indicators (KPIs) for each technique. |
| 1.3 | Identify key sections and value stream members responsible for each KPI. |
| 1.4 | Identify key personnel for communications. |
|
2 | Develop an open environment | 2.1 | Establish and maintain regular dialogue between all levels and all relevant sections of the organisation. |
| 2.2 | Encourage a flow of communications in both directions. |
| 2.3 | Develop and maintain a formal mechanism for the flow of issues, concerns and suggestions in both directions. |
| 2.4 | Develop and maintain regular and frequent communication with all key stakeholders. |
|
3 | Identify significant issues | 3.1 | Identify current and potential issues in liaison with relevant team members/stakeholders. |
| 3.2 | Assist team members/stakeholders to formulate issues. |
| 3.3 | Identify and define boundary and non-negotiable issues for all team members/stakeholders. |
| 3.4 | Negotiate with relevant team members/stakeholders over actual and potential issues. |
|
4 | Proactively resolve issues | 4.1 | Liaise with team members/stakeholders to develop agreed, and where possible, win-win solutions. |
| 4.2 | Negotiate acceptable solutions, as required, in accordance with company practices/procedures. |
| 4.3 | Obtain any required official authorisations. |
| 4.4 | Consult with relevant stakeholders to develop implementation plan. |
| 4.5 | Implement solution. |
|
5 | Monitor ongoing situation | 5.1 | Determine relevant KPIs for plan. |
| 5.2 | Check that implementation is proceeding to plan. |
| 5.3 | Check for unforeseen consequences. |
| 5.4 | Take action to resolve any arising issues. |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and include the ability, for one (1) or more work areas, to:
identify the processes used and scope of products/services supplied by the organisation and the deliverables expected by customers
relate processes and products/services to the competitive systems and practices implementation process and the stage of implementation
communicate and gain support for changes made as a result of the implementation of the competitive systems and practices
develop formal and informal channels of communication, including feedback mechanisms
proactively resolve issues and problems raised by people with the competitive systems and practices implementation process.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to manage relationships, including knowledge of:
competitive systems and practices tools used in own workplace
work health and safety (WHS) and regulatory requirements, codes of practice, standards, risk management and registration requirements relevant to the task
change implementation contacts and procedures for the organisation
employee assistance mechanisms in the organisation
current processes and principles of operation sufficient to enable communication with others on the impact of competitive operational changes
sources of data on the process/plant and possible applications to information distribution
methods of determining own skill needs and developing skills.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project where management of people relationships occurs in an operational workplace.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
The assessor must demonstrate both technical competency and currency.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR
relevant workplace experience
Currency can be demonstrated through:
performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR
having consulted with an organisation providing relevant environmental monitoring, management or technology services about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.